Feminism: A Very Short Introduction

Feminism: A Very Short Introduction

Margaret Walters - Feminism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2005. 160 lk

Väga lühikeste sissejuhatuste seast on see minu jaoks esimene, kuigi järjekorras ootab juba mitu. Esmamulje seeriast on hea. Feminismist endast väga palju arvata ei oska. Ootasin midagi äärmuslikumat. Ehk ei vastanud see minu ootustele, kuna raamat keskendub inglise feministidele ja seda läbi Oxfordi monokkli. Raamat alustab keskaja erandjuhtumitest e naistest kes avaldasid arvamust kirjasõnas. Ja sealt edasi jätkab Margaret samal lainel ja jutustab 17nda, 18nda ja 19nda sajandi naiskirjanikest, kes oma kirjutistes kõnelesid naiste kannatustest. Alles 19nda sajandi lõpus ja 20nda sajandi alguses läheb asi huvitavamaks, kuna hästiorganiseeritud naised jõuavad tänavale protestima ja rüüstama.
Mida tänapäeval peetakse feminismiks e selle fundamentaalsem (pooleldi lesbiline) vorm 60ndatest ja 70ndatest saadik saab vähem tähelepanu kui oleksin lootnud ja selle tühimiku täitmiseks tuleks lugeda veel mõni raamat fenimismist. Viiteid neile on selles teoses palju, kuna põhirõhk on kirjutajatel. Silma torkas Simone de Beauvoir-i raamat The Second Sex, kuid see on prantsuse keelest inglise keelde tõlgitud konarlikult (alles eelmine aasta tuli uus tõlge välja, mida niipea mina vist kätte ei saa) ja on 800 lehekülge pikk pluss pooleldi autobiograafiline.
Mitmed teemad tõepoolest haakusid Sex-Ploytationist loetuga: glass ceiling, pornograafia, koduvägivald ja naistehaigused (rinna- ja emakakaelavähk). Paralleele tuua veel ei oska, sest väga lühike sissejuhatus ei kaldunud olema niivõrd radikaalne kui spektrumi teises otsas jalgu trampiv Sex-Ploytation. Soovin sel teemal lugeda veel.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Real understanding of any scientific subject must include some knowledge of its historical growth; we cannot comprehend and accept modern concepts and theories without knowing something of their origins - of how we have got where we are. Neglect of this maxim can lead to that unfortunate state of mind which regard the science of the day as finality. (Cherry 1977: 32)

We should temper reading by writing, and reciprocally, so that the written composition gives body (corpus) to what has been obtained by reading. Reading collects orationes logoi (discourses, elements of discourse); we must make a corpus of them. (Foucault 2005: 359)

The existence of the inner book, along with unreading or forgetting, is what makes the way we discuss books so discontinuous and heterogeneous. What we take to be the books we have read is in fact an anomalous accumulation of fragments of texts, reworked by our imagination and unrelated to the books of others, even if these books are materially identical to ones we have held in our hands. (Bayard 2007: 85-86)

The post-Cubist function of quotations in collages emerges with particular clarity in the early notes of Eisenstein, who wrote in 1928 that "an entire treatise can be made by composition of quotations." In his later works, in which compositions of quotations are often used, he himself explains them (in the spirit of the "linear style" of quotations) by a desire for "minimal distortion." (Ivanov 1976b: 323)

A person may be interested in scientific statements for their own sake (interested in collecting them as a person may be interested in collecting butterflies); a person may have knowledge and the increase of knowledge as his goal. (Morris 1949: 128)

In non-literate society, of course, there are usually some individuals whose interests lead them to collect, analyse and interpret the cultural tradition in a personal way [but] it is still evident that the literate individual has in practice so large a field of personal selection from the total cultural repertoire that the odds are strongly against his experiencing the cultural tradition as any sort of patterned whole. (Goody & Watt 1963: 335)

A different language is too often taken for stammering, a nonconformist virtuosity is misinterpreted as formlessness, exquisite variability is confused with cruelty, intentional enigmatic indefiniteness is deplored as the disappointing obscurity or fragmentariness of a mere neglected sketch, and in the stupendous interplay of symmetry and disequilibrium onesided critics are prone to overlook the harmony and to observe nothing but chaos. (Jakobson 1981[1967b]: 498)

I am convinced that there must still be a number of other concepts or models of potentially systemic generality scattered in some (un)fairly unknown works of disappeared or living researchers. We should dive for them in the deeps of literature. (François 1999: 217)

The selections included are of such a nature that readers who feel that the study of the history of systematic social theory is a waste of time will have occasion to ponder how thoroughly our predecessors have plagiarized many of our best ideas. (Meyer 1956: 166)

This, we may conceive, would be no small Advantage to the Knowledge of a thinking Man, if all his past Thoughts and Reasonings could be always present to him. (Locke 1741a: 115)

blogger visitor counter